<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (4) TMI 112 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196434</link>
    <description>The court held that findings and entries by the Assistant Charity Commissioner are binding and final, with specific remedies available under the Act. The Civil Court lacks jurisdiction over matters already decided by the Charity Commissioner. Plaintiffs&#039; failure to utilize remedies under Section 22A and Section 70 led to dismissal of their revision, with costs awarded to opponents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:10:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (4) TMI 112 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196434</link>
      <description>The court held that findings and entries by the Assistant Charity Commissioner are binding and final, with specific remedies available under the Act. The Civil Court lacks jurisdiction over matters already decided by the Charity Commissioner. Plaintiffs&#039; failure to utilize remedies under Section 22A and Section 70 led to dismissal of their revision, with costs awarded to opponents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>