https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196429 Specific averments that accused directors or authorised signatories were in charge of, and responsible for, the company's day-to-day business are sufficient at the summoning stage to attract vicarious liability in cheque dishonour prosecutions. Detailed evidence is not required in the complaint if the necessary factual foundation is pleaded. Disputed claims of resignation and other defence material raise questions of fact that cannot ordinarily be decided in proceedings under inherent jurisdiction for quashing, and such defences may be pursued at trial. The complaints and summoning orders were therefore allowed to stand. en-us Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:40:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196429 Specific averments that accused directors or authorised signatories were in charge of, and responsible for, the company's day-to-day business are sufficient at the summoning stage to attract vicarious liability in cheque dishonour prosecutions. Detailed evidence is not required in the complaint if the necessary factual foundation is pleaded. Disputed claims of resignation and other defence material raise questions of fact that cannot ordinarily be decided in proceedings under inherent jurisdiction for quashing, and such defences may be pursued at trial. The complaints and summoning orders were therefore allowed to stand. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196429