https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196428 The Supreme Court of India upheld the constitutionality and validity of Control Orders issued under the Essential Commodities Act 1955, specifically the Rice (Southern Zone) Movement Control Order 1957, Southern States (Regulation of Exports of Rice) Order 1964, and Andhra Pradesh Rice and Paddy (Restriction of Movement) Order 1965. The Court dismissed the petition challenging the Act, emphasizing that the Control Orders were legislative in nature, issued to regulate rice product export and movement. It clarified that the absence of provisions for appeal against permit refusals was reasonable due to involvement of high-ranking officials in the decision-making process, and concluded that the Central Government had adequate guidance to exercise its powers under the Act. en-us Mon, 30 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:20:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196428 The Supreme Court of India upheld the constitutionality and validity of Control Orders issued under the Essential Commodities Act 1955, specifically the Rice (Southern Zone) Movement Control Order 1957, Southern States (Regulation of Exports of Rice) Order 1964, and Andhra Pradesh Rice and Paddy (Restriction of Movement) Order 1965. The Court dismissed the petition challenging the Act, emphasizing that the Control Orders were legislative in nature, issued to regulate rice product export and movement. It clarified that the absence of provisions for appeal against permit refusals was reasonable due to involvement of high-ranking officials in the decision-making process, and concluded that the Central Government had adequate guidance to exercise its powers under the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196428