<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1161 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196420</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal in all three issues, upholding the decisions of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the additions. The additions under sections 2(22)(e) and 68 of the Act were deleted based on evidence showing that the transactions were for business purposes and the creditors were creditworthy, respectively. The expenses for domestic and foreign traveling were also allowed as legitimate business expenses, as supported by the documentation provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:24:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1161 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196420</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal in all three issues, upholding the decisions of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the additions. The additions under sections 2(22)(e) and 68 of the Act were deleted based on evidence showing that the transactions were for business purposes and the creditors were creditworthy, respectively. The expenses for domestic and foreign traveling were also allowed as legitimate business expenses, as supported by the documentation provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>