<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1607 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351728</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing depreciation claim for machinery used in trial production at a clinker/cement factory, emphasizing that even short-term use qualifies for depreciation benefits. Regarding the computation of book profit under Section 115JA, the High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the provision in question did not belong to the profit and loss account and therefore could not be added to the book profit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1607 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351728</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing depreciation claim for machinery used in trial production at a clinker/cement factory, emphasizing that even short-term use qualifies for depreciation benefits. Regarding the computation of book profit under Section 115JA, the High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the provision in question did not belong to the profit and loss account and therefore could not be added to the book profit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>