<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 81 -  ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10794</link>
    <description>The High Court held in favor of the assessee, ruling that the amount of Rs. 1,00,298 had not accrued and could not be taxed as income for the assessment year 1975-76. The court emphasized that the firm had no legal right to the excess amount realized from the sale of fertilizers due to pending court orders, distinguishing the case from precedents cited by the Revenue. The decision was based on the specific circumstances of the case, ultimately concluding that the disputed amount did not form part of the firm&#039;s taxable income for that year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 81 -  ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10794</link>
      <description>The High Court held in favor of the assessee, ruling that the amount of Rs. 1,00,298 had not accrued and could not be taxed as income for the assessment year 1975-76. The court emphasized that the firm had no legal right to the excess amount realized from the sale of fertilizers due to pending court orders, distinguishing the case from precedents cited by the Revenue. The decision was based on the specific circumstances of the case, ultimately concluding that the disputed amount did not form part of the firm&#039;s taxable income for that year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>