<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1593 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351714</link>
    <description>A later circle rate could not be used to reverse-work the cost inflation index for an earlier year, and the addition made on that basis was deleted. On the agricultural receipts issue, contemporaneous revenue records such as Jambandi and Girdawari supported the finding that the land remained in the assessee&#039;s possession, so the amount was not treated as long-term capital gain. Deduction under section 54B was upheld because the agreement to purchase, transfer of possession, and deposit of consideration in the capital gain account scheme satisfied the statutory conditions and the principles of part performance. The Revenue&#039;s appeal failed on all substantive issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:42:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1593 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351714</link>
      <description>A later circle rate could not be used to reverse-work the cost inflation index for an earlier year, and the addition made on that basis was deleted. On the agricultural receipts issue, contemporaneous revenue records such as Jambandi and Girdawari supported the finding that the land remained in the assessee&#039;s possession, so the amount was not treated as long-term capital gain. Deduction under section 54B was upheld because the agreement to purchase, transfer of possession, and deposit of consideration in the capital gain account scheme satisfied the statutory conditions and the principles of part performance. The Revenue&#039;s appeal failed on all substantive issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>