<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1590 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351711</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT (Appeals) decision to grant the deduction under section 80-IB to the assessee, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal. The ITAT found the project did not commence before the specified date, the built-up area complied with requirements, and the definition applied prospectively. Previous deductions were consistent, and the ITAT emphasized factual accuracy and legal interpretations in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:42:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1590 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351711</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT (Appeals) decision to grant the deduction under section 80-IB to the assessee, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal. The ITAT found the project did not commence before the specified date, the built-up area complied with requirements, and the definition applied prospectively. Previous deductions were consistent, and the ITAT emphasized factual accuracy and legal interpretations in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>