<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1587 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in the case, dismissing both the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross objections for the relevant assessment years. The CIT(A) correctly granted exemption under section 10(23C) for additions made under section 68, relying on established judicial precedents. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s disallowance of 10% of donations as anonymous under section 115BBC, considering the inability to verify donor identities. The Tribunal also ruled that the CIT(A) did not exceed jurisdiction in treating donations as anonymous, as the AO had already investigated this matter during assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:42:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1587 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in the case, dismissing both the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross objections for the relevant assessment years. The CIT(A) correctly granted exemption under section 10(23C) for additions made under section 68, relying on established judicial precedents. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s disallowance of 10% of donations as anonymous under section 115BBC, considering the inability to verify donor identities. The Tribunal also ruled that the CIT(A) did not exceed jurisdiction in treating donations as anonymous, as the AO had already investigated this matter during assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>