<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1584 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351705</link>
    <description>Coking coal imported under the relevant bills of entry was found eligible for exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus because the applicable notification did not impose an end-use requirement and did not require actual conversion into coke. Technical material, laboratory reports, trade descriptions and contemporaneous records showed weak coking characteristics and supported classification as soft or semi-soft coking coal. The later amendment introducing more detailed technical criteria was treated as confirming that the earlier exemption covered coal of the relevant coking character. In the absence of convincing contrary evidence, the duty demand and consequential penalties were held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1584 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351705</link>
      <description>Coking coal imported under the relevant bills of entry was found eligible for exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus because the applicable notification did not impose an end-use requirement and did not require actual conversion into coke. Technical material, laboratory reports, trade descriptions and contemporaneous records showed weak coking characteristics and supported classification as soft or semi-soft coking coal. The later amendment introducing more detailed technical criteria was treated as confirming that the earlier exemption covered coal of the relevant coking character. In the absence of convincing contrary evidence, the duty demand and consequential penalties were held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>