<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 68 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10792</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s restricted remand and directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the residential status of the building in Thodupuzha to determine the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the benefit under section 54F of the Income-tax Act. The Court allowed both the Revenue and the assessee to present arguments regarding the nature of the disputed building, leaving the final decision to the Assessing Officer based on the evidence provided by the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 68 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10792</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s restricted remand and directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the residential status of the building in Thodupuzha to determine the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the benefit under section 54F of the Income-tax Act. The Court allowed both the Revenue and the assessee to present arguments regarding the nature of the disputed building, leaving the final decision to the Assessing Officer based on the evidence provided by the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>