<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1575 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351696</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order demanding service tax under reverse charge mechanism for royalty paid to a foreign company for intellectual property services. Relying on precedent and legal interpretation, the Tribunal found the order unsustainable, citing that liability to pay service tax on such royalties was settled in favor of the assessees. The appellant was granted relief, and the matter was resolved in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 07:58:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1575 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351696</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order demanding service tax under reverse charge mechanism for royalty paid to a foreign company for intellectual property services. Relying on precedent and legal interpretation, the Tribunal found the order unsustainable, citing that liability to pay service tax on such royalties was settled in favor of the assessees. The appellant was granted relief, and the matter was resolved in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>