<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1568 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351689</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the cenvat credit on Event Management services for the period April 2005 to August 2009. It held that the services directly related to the promotion of goods are eligible for cenvat credit. The appellant&#039;s event was for promoting their brand and the product manufactured by them, used by infrastructure industries. As the service tax payment was not disputed, and the credit was based on invoices from the ISD Head Office, the Tribunal found the credit availed and distributed to be in accordance with the law. The decision disallowed the earlier order and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 07:58:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1568 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351689</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the cenvat credit on Event Management services for the period April 2005 to August 2009. It held that the services directly related to the promotion of goods are eligible for cenvat credit. The appellant&#039;s event was for promoting their brand and the product manufactured by them, used by infrastructure industries. As the service tax payment was not disputed, and the credit was based on invoices from the ISD Head Office, the Tribunal found the credit availed and distributed to be in accordance with the law. The decision disallowed the earlier order and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>