https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351688 Where the same alleged removal of excisable goods without duty payment and without proper invoices had already been decided against the department in earlier proceedings, a consequential penalty based on that very issue could not survive. The Tribunal noted that the dispute concerning the 15 invoices had been covered by the prior order of the same Bench, which had already set aside the duty demand and penalty. On that basis, the penalty in the present matter was found unsustainable and the impugned order was interfered with to that extent, leaving the assessee free from the penalty. en-us Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Nov 2017 07:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351688 Where the same alleged removal of excisable goods without duty payment and without proper invoices had already been decided against the department in earlier proceedings, a consequential penalty based on that very issue could not survive. The Tribunal noted that the dispute concerning the 15 invoices had been covered by the prior order of the same Bench, which had already set aside the duty demand and penalty. On that basis, the penalty in the present matter was found unsustainable and the impugned order was interfered with to that extent, leaving the assessee free from the penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351688