https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196394 A landlord's amendment restoring a bona fide requirement ground was discussed as not being barred by Order 2 Rule 2 CPC, because that rule applies to omission of part of the same cause of action and does not prevent revival of a separate ground in the same proceedings. Constructive res judicata was also treated as inapplicable, since there had been no prior adjudication between the parties on that point. On constitutionality, Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act was analysed as a special summary procedure confined to bona fide requirement cases, supported by a reasonable classification and tenant safeguards, and therefore not violative of Article 14. en-us Thu, 04 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:36:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196394 A landlord's amendment restoring a bona fide requirement ground was discussed as not being barred by Order 2 Rule 2 CPC, because that rule applies to omission of part of the same cause of action and does not prevent revival of a separate ground in the same proceedings. Constructive res judicata was also treated as inapplicable, since there had been no prior adjudication between the parties on that point. On constitutionality, Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act was analysed as a special summary procedure confined to bona fide requirement cases, supported by a reasonable classification and tenant safeguards, and therefore not violative of Article 14. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196394