<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 91 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10787</link>
    <description>The High Court of ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the disallowance under section 40A(8) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is not limited to interest paid to directors and their relatives but applies to all interest payments made by a company. The Court clarified that 15% of the interest amount should be disallowed in all instances where interest is paid, regardless of the recipient.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 91 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10787</link>
      <description>The High Court of ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the disallowance under section 40A(8) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is not limited to interest paid to directors and their relatives but applies to all interest payments made by a company. The Court clarified that 15% of the interest amount should be disallowed in all instances where interest is paid, regardless of the recipient.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>