<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1746 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196392</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2005-06. The penalty was deemed inappropriate due to the debatable nature of interest allowance timing, conflicting tribunal decisions, and lack of willful concealment. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty was not justified in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:55:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1746 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196392</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2005-06. The penalty was deemed inappropriate due to the debatable nature of interest allowance timing, conflicting tribunal decisions, and lack of willful concealment. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty was not justified in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>