<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 792 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196384</link>
    <description>Special Leave Petitions were dismissed on account of delay in presentation, with the Court treating delay as a bar to admission. The petitions were also examined on merits and found not to warrant admission on substantive grounds. The document records that dismissal may rest on both procedural delay and independent substantive insufficiency, resulting in rejection of the petitions on each basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 14:42:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 792 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196384</link>
      <description>Special Leave Petitions were dismissed on account of delay in presentation, with the Court treating delay as a bar to admission. The petitions were also examined on merits and found not to warrant admission on substantive grounds. The document records that dismissal may rest on both procedural delay and independent substantive insufficiency, resulting in rejection of the petitions on each basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>