<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1551 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351672</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh determination. The errors in the adjustment methodology, comparability analysis, and failure to refer the matter to the Transfer Pricing Officer were noted. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following procedural requirements and principles of natural justice in Transfer Pricing assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 07:45:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1551 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351672</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh determination. The errors in the adjustment methodology, comparability analysis, and failure to refer the matter to the Transfer Pricing Officer were noted. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following procedural requirements and principles of natural justice in Transfer Pricing assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>