<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1525 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351646</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the application for the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor based on unpaid salary claims. It found the applicant, an operational creditor, had met the procedural requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal dismissed objections raised by the corporate debtor, including allegations of forum shopping and non-compliance with Section 9(3)(c) of the Code. It issued a moratorium under Section 14, prohibiting legal actions against the debtor and asset transfers. The burden of proof was emphasized to lie with the party making allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1525 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351646</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the application for the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor based on unpaid salary claims. It found the applicant, an operational creditor, had met the procedural requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal dismissed objections raised by the corporate debtor, including allegations of forum shopping and non-compliance with Section 9(3)(c) of the Code. It issued a moratorium under Section 14, prohibiting legal actions against the debtor and asset transfers. The burden of proof was emphasized to lie with the party making allegations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>