https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351638 The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a penalty under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellant but reduced the penalty amount from 7.50 lakhs to 2,00,000. Despite the appellant's claim of lack of involvement and knowledge in the violations committed by the main noticee, the Tribunal found sufficient evidence to support the penalty imposition. The appeal was dismissed except for the modification of the penalty amount, emphasizing the appellant's role in the customs duty violations. en-us Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Feb 2018 16:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351638 The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a penalty under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellant but reduced the penalty amount from 7.50 lakhs to 2,00,000. Despite the appellant's claim of lack of involvement and knowledge in the violations committed by the main noticee, the Tribunal found sufficient evidence to support the penalty imposition. The appeal was dismissed except for the modification of the penalty amount, emphasizing the appellant's role in the customs duty violations. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351638