https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351632 The appeal by Bharat Bijlee Ltd. against the denial of cenvat credit for security, courier, and repair services was heard by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI. The Tribunal allowed credit for courier services for documentation purposes but not for procurement of inputs or clearance of finished goods. Additionally, credit for repair and maintenance services within the factory premises was permitted. However, the denial of credit for security services for transit to buyer's premises was upheld. The penalty imposed was also maintained due to contradictory arguments by the appellant. The appeal was partially allowed based on these findings. en-us Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Nov 2017 07:30:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351632 The appeal by Bharat Bijlee Ltd. against the denial of cenvat credit for security, courier, and repair services was heard by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI. The Tribunal allowed credit for courier services for documentation purposes but not for procurement of inputs or clearance of finished goods. Additionally, credit for repair and maintenance services within the factory premises was permitted. However, the denial of credit for security services for transit to buyer's premises was upheld. The penalty imposed was also maintained due to contradictory arguments by the appellant. The appeal was partially allowed based on these findings. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351632