<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1508 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351629</link>
    <description>Documents showing that goods were sent by the principal manufacturer under returnable challans, together with the job-work register and supporting declarations, were treated as material to the core issue of whether the clearance fell within the job-work and exemption regime. The Tribunal noted that such evidence could not be ignored merely because some documents had not been produced before the original authority, especially where the contention had not been examined. It therefore sustained the remand for de novo adjudication so the exemption claim and any duty demand on the job worker could be decided afresh after due opportunity and in accordance with natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1508 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351629</link>
      <description>Documents showing that goods were sent by the principal manufacturer under returnable challans, together with the job-work register and supporting declarations, were treated as material to the core issue of whether the clearance fell within the job-work and exemption regime. The Tribunal noted that such evidence could not be ignored merely because some documents had not been produced before the original authority, especially where the contention had not been examined. It therefore sustained the remand for de novo adjudication so the exemption claim and any duty demand on the job worker could be decided afresh after due opportunity and in accordance with natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>