<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 97 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10777</link>
    <description>The court held that the annual value for computing income from house property should be based on the actual rent received by the lessor, not the higher rent obtained by the lessee through sub-letting. Additionally, interest-free loans should not be factored into the determination of annual value. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The court ruled against considering the rent received by the lessee in sub-letting and emphasized adherence to the Income-tax Act provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 97 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10777</link>
      <description>The court held that the annual value for computing income from house property should be based on the actual rent received by the lessor, not the higher rent obtained by the lessee through sub-letting. Additionally, interest-free loans should not be factored into the determination of annual value. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The court ruled against considering the rent received by the lessee in sub-letting and emphasized adherence to the Income-tax Act provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>