<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1361 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196362</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on the disallowance of provision for Leave Encashment, directing a fresh adjudication based on legal precedents. The disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D was partially sustained, with a recalibration of interest. The Tribunal addressed the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C, instructing a recalculation. The allowance of deduction claimed on account of provisions of warranty was upheld, citing prior favorable judgments. The deletion of disallowance of additional depreciation was affirmed, emphasizing the assets&#039; use in the manufacturing plant. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed on these grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 21:25:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1361 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196362</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on the disallowance of provision for Leave Encashment, directing a fresh adjudication based on legal precedents. The disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D was partially sustained, with a recalibration of interest. The Tribunal addressed the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C, instructing a recalculation. The allowance of deduction claimed on account of provisions of warranty was upheld, citing prior favorable judgments. The deletion of disallowance of additional depreciation was affirmed, emphasizing the assets&#039; use in the manufacturing plant. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed on these grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>