https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196360 The Competition Commission of India (CCI) determined that Hockey India (HI) and the International Hockey Federation (FIH) qualify as "enterprises" under the Competition Act, 2002, and asserted jurisdiction over them. The CCI identified two relevant markets: the organization of private professional hockey leagues in India and services of hockey players, finding HI dominant due to its regulatory powers. While the CCI did not find abuse of dominance or anti-competitive agreements under Sections 3 and 4 of the Act, it recommended HI establish internal controls to prevent conflicts of interest. A dissenting opinion by R. Prasad found HI and FIH had abused their dominance, recommending changes to agreements and imposing penalties. en-us Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:57:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196360 The Competition Commission of India (CCI) determined that Hockey India (HI) and the International Hockey Federation (FIH) qualify as "enterprises" under the Competition Act, 2002, and asserted jurisdiction over them. The CCI identified two relevant markets: the organization of private professional hockey leagues in India and services of hockey players, finding HI dominant due to its regulatory powers. While the CCI did not find abuse of dominance or anti-competitive agreements under Sections 3 and 4 of the Act, it recommended HI establish internal controls to prevent conflicts of interest. A dissenting opinion by R. Prasad found HI and FIH had abused their dominance, recommending changes to agreements and imposing penalties. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196360