https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196355 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision dismissing the appellants' applications to recall a consent decree, ruling it was valid and binding. The court found no merit in fraud and coercion claims, stating the Power of Attorney holder acted within authority. Compliance with legal procedures was affirmed, and the appellants were estopped from challenging the decree. The court emphasized the binding nature of consent decrees, citing precedent. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the High Court's order. en-us Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:35:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196355 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision dismissing the appellants' applications to recall a consent decree, ruling it was valid and binding. The court found no merit in fraud and coercion claims, stating the Power of Attorney holder acted within authority. Compliance with legal procedures was affirmed, and the appellants were estopped from challenging the decree. The court emphasized the binding nature of consent decrees, citing precedent. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the High Court's order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196355