https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196352 A belated request to send disputed board minutes and statutory records for forensic examination was rejected because the documents had been on record since 2007 and no timely expert request was made. The alleged forgery was unsupported by credible particulars or any contemporaneous complaint, and the records appeared to have arisen in the ordinary course of corporate and statutory filings. The existence of an oppression and mismanagement dispute did not justify a roving or fishing enquiry based only on suspicion. The application was therefore treated as unnecessary and an abuse of process intended to delay the main proceedings, and it was dismissed with costs. en-us Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:53:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196352 A belated request to send disputed board minutes and statutory records for forensic examination was rejected because the documents had been on record since 2007 and no timely expert request was made. The alleged forgery was unsupported by credible particulars or any contemporaneous complaint, and the records appeared to have arisen in the ordinary course of corporate and statutory filings. The existence of an oppression and mismanagement dispute did not justify a roving or fishing enquiry based only on suspicion. The application was therefore treated as unnecessary and an abuse of process intended to delay the main proceedings, and it was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196352