https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196346 In a disputed family company, the power of attorney was accepted as sufficient authority to institute proceedings, and objections to counsel's authority and non-impleadment of the Central Government and Registrar of Companies failed. The board and extraordinary general meeting of 18 May 2006 were invalid because proper statutory notice was not proved; certificate of posting alone was insufficient in the absence of reliable dispatch records. As the resolutions lacked valid notice, the appointment of a director, increase in authorised capital, allotment of shares, and related filings were set aside. The shifting of the registered office and exclusion of the petitioning group from management were treated as oppressive and lacking probity, justifying restorative relief and joint control arrangements. en-us Tue, 05 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:29:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196346 In a disputed family company, the power of attorney was accepted as sufficient authority to institute proceedings, and objections to counsel's authority and non-impleadment of the Central Government and Registrar of Companies failed. The board and extraordinary general meeting of 18 May 2006 were invalid because proper statutory notice was not proved; certificate of posting alone was insufficient in the absence of reliable dispatch records. As the resolutions lacked valid notice, the appointment of a director, increase in authorised capital, allotment of shares, and related filings were set aside. The shifting of the registered office and exclusion of the petitioning group from management were treated as oppressive and lacking probity, justifying restorative relief and joint control arrangements. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 05 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196346