<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1745 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196345</link>
    <description>The court set aside the Company Law Board&#039;s order dated May 17, 2010, regarding document disclosure in a case involving allegations of oppression and mismanagement by AI Champdany Industries Ltd. The matter was remanded back to the Board for a fresh hearing to properly establish a prima facie case and reconsider the document disclosure order, emphasizing the importance of assessing evidence before ordering disclosure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:21:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1745 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196345</link>
      <description>The court set aside the Company Law Board&#039;s order dated May 17, 2010, regarding document disclosure in a case involving allegations of oppression and mismanagement by AI Champdany Industries Ltd. The matter was remanded back to the Board for a fresh hearing to properly establish a prima facie case and reconsider the document disclosure order, emphasizing the importance of assessing evidence before ordering disclosure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>