https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196341 The appellate court ruled against the retired employee, denying his entitlement to pension and gratuity under a trust scheme for religious and charitable purposes. It clarified that the Payment of Gratuity Act did not automatically apply to the trust and that disputes regarding gratuity fell under the Act's exclusive jurisdiction, superseding Civil Court authority. The court also determined that the employee's personal claims for pension and gratuity were not amendable under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the petitioner's claims were rejected, overturning the trial court's decision. en-us Tue, 25 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:31:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196341 The appellate court ruled against the retired employee, denying his entitlement to pension and gratuity under a trust scheme for religious and charitable purposes. It clarified that the Payment of Gratuity Act did not automatically apply to the trust and that disputes regarding gratuity fell under the Act's exclusive jurisdiction, superseding Civil Court authority. The court also determined that the employee's personal claims for pension and gratuity were not amendable under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the petitioner's claims were rejected, overturning the trial court's decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196341