https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196338 The Supreme Court set aside the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order and remitted the matter back to the State Commission to decide on the jurisdiction question regarding a dispute between a chit fund and a prized subscriber. The Court emphasized the importance of determining jurisdiction under the Consumer Protection Act and disagreed with the National Commission's dismissal of the revision petition without considering the jurisdiction issue. The parties were directed to appear before the State Commission for further proceedings, with the Court clarifying that its decision did not address the merits of the case and allowed the appeal without costs. en-us Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:49:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196338 The Supreme Court set aside the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order and remitted the matter back to the State Commission to decide on the jurisdiction question regarding a dispute between a chit fund and a prized subscriber. The Court emphasized the importance of determining jurisdiction under the Consumer Protection Act and disagreed with the National Commission's dismissal of the revision petition without considering the jurisdiction issue. The parties were directed to appear before the State Commission for further proceedings, with the Court clarifying that its decision did not address the merits of the case and allowed the appeal without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196338