<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1218 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196336</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for A.Y. 2006-07, 2007-08, and 2009-10, with deletions of significant additions under Section 69B and adjustments in ALV computation based on municipal rateable value. The Tribunal stressed the requirement for corroborative evidence for additions under Sections 69B and 69C, dismissing reliance solely on loose papers. The assessee&#039;s contentions were upheld, resulting in the deletion of the added amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:39:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1218 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196336</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for A.Y. 2006-07, 2007-08, and 2009-10, with deletions of significant additions under Section 69B and adjustments in ALV computation based on municipal rateable value. The Tribunal stressed the requirement for corroborative evidence for additions under Sections 69B and 69C, dismissing reliance solely on loose papers. The assessee&#039;s contentions were upheld, resulting in the deletion of the added amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>