https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351618 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the service tax liability for the extended period and the penalty imposed. The liability was confirmed only for the normal period as declared by the appellant, based on the appellant's diligent payment of service tax on their Consulting Engineer Service and the genuine belief that service tax was not applicable to services rendered as a sub-consultant. The Tribunal found the appellant's disclosure of all considerations in their statutory returns to be truthful and complete, ultimately determining that the demand for the extended period was not sustainable. en-us Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351618 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the service tax liability for the extended period and the penalty imposed. The liability was confirmed only for the normal period as declared by the appellant, based on the appellant's diligent payment of service tax on their Consulting Engineer Service and the genuine belief that service tax was not applicable to services rendered as a sub-consultant. The Tribunal found the appellant's disclosure of all considerations in their statutory returns to be truthful and complete, ultimately determining that the demand for the extended period was not sustainable. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351618