<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Declines to Direct Decision in Anti-Dumping Duty Case, Citing Clarity of Rule 12 of Customs Tariff Rules.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37004</link>
    <description>Proceedings to levy Anti-dumping duty - Exclusion of the party from the proceedings - the rules are clear, especially Rule 12 of the Customs Tariff Rules and there is no necessity for this Court to issue any direction to the first respondent to decide the matter in a particular manner nor it would be right in doing so - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:31:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:31:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Declines to Direct Decision in Anti-Dumping Duty Case, Citing Clarity of Rule 12 of Customs Tariff Rules.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37004</link>
      <description>Proceedings to levy Anti-dumping duty - Exclusion of the party from the proceedings - the rules are clear, especially Rule 12 of the Customs Tariff Rules and there is no necessity for this Court to issue any direction to the first respondent to decide the matter in a particular manner nor it would be right in doing so - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:31:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>