https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351616 In anti-dumping proceedings, the Designated Authority must assess whether the application is by or on behalf of the domestic industry, whether the parties are related to exporters or importers, and whether sufficient evidence supports initiation under the Customs Tariff Act and the Anti-Dumping Rules. A jurisdictional objection need not be determined as a separate preliminary issue before the investigation proceeds; it may be considered within the statutory inquiry while objections of interested parties are examined. The material at initiation is only a prima facie view, not a final determination, so a request to compel upfront adjudication of jurisdiction and to quash the initiation notification was rejected. en-us Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351616 In anti-dumping proceedings, the Designated Authority must assess whether the application is by or on behalf of the domestic industry, whether the parties are related to exporters or importers, and whether sufficient evidence supports initiation under the Customs Tariff Act and the Anti-Dumping Rules. A jurisdictional objection need not be determined as a separate preliminary issue before the investigation proceeds; it may be considered within the statutory inquiry while objections of interested parties are examined. The material at initiation is only a prima facie view, not a final determination, so a request to compel upfront adjudication of jurisdiction and to quash the initiation notification was rejected. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351616