https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351613 The court rejected the petitioner's claim to quash a judgment and sentence under Section 266C/277 of the Income Tax Act. It found that the error in claiming depreciation on land was not rectified promptly after detection, indicating lack of oversight. The court upheld the judgment, emphasizing the need for proper scrutiny in financial processes. The petition was dismissed, affirming the validity of the original judgment and sentence. en-us Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351613 The court rejected the petitioner's claim to quash a judgment and sentence under Section 266C/277 of the Income Tax Act. It found that the error in claiming depreciation on land was not rectified promptly after detection, indicating lack of oversight. The court upheld the judgment, emphasizing the need for proper scrutiny in financial processes. The petition was dismissed, affirming the validity of the original judgment and sentence. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351613