<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 93 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10768</link>
    <description>HC held the Tribunal erred in rejecting the assessee&#039;s books and in applying the prior year gross profit rate (18.71%) for AY 1990-91 and 1991-92. Rejection of accounts under proviso to s.145 requires a finding that records are incorrect, incomplete, or the accounting method prevents deducing income; absence of item-wise stock entries alone does not justify rejection. The Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 93 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10768</link>
      <description>HC held the Tribunal erred in rejecting the assessee&#039;s books and in applying the prior year gross profit rate (18.71%) for AY 1990-91 and 1991-92. Rejection of accounts under proviso to s.145 requires a finding that records are incorrect, incomplete, or the accounting method prevents deducing income; absence of item-wise stock entries alone does not justify rejection. The Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>