<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1473 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351594</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the taxpayer was allowed for statistical purposes, with specific directions to recompute the margin after excluding identified comparables. The tribunal emphasized the importance of using appropriate comparables for benchmarking international transactions in alignment with the taxpayer&#039;s functional profile.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:39:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1473 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351594</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the taxpayer was allowed for statistical purposes, with specific directions to recompute the margin after excluding identified comparables. The tribunal emphasized the importance of using appropriate comparables for benchmarking international transactions in alignment with the taxpayer&#039;s functional profile.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>