<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1471 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351592</link>
    <description>In transfer pricing benchmarking, reimbursement of an arbitration award paid on behalf of an associated enterprise was not treated as part of the assessee&#039;s operating cost base for margin computation, as the payment was reimbursed and did not warrant inclusion in the tested party&#039;s cost base. The Tribunal also accepted that a captive service provider may be entitled to risk adjustment under the TNMM where comparables operate with materially different risk profiles, and such adjustment is required to place the tested party and comparables on a comparable footing when supported by a reasoned basis and reliable data. The transfer pricing additions were therefore interfered with only to the extent of these issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 14:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1471 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351592</link>
      <description>In transfer pricing benchmarking, reimbursement of an arbitration award paid on behalf of an associated enterprise was not treated as part of the assessee&#039;s operating cost base for margin computation, as the payment was reimbursed and did not warrant inclusion in the tested party&#039;s cost base. The Tribunal also accepted that a captive service provider may be entitled to risk adjustment under the TNMM where comparables operate with materially different risk profiles, and such adjustment is required to place the tested party and comparables on a comparable footing when supported by a reasoned basis and reliable data. The transfer pricing additions were therefore interfered with only to the extent of these issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>