<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1470 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351591</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, reducing the trading addition but upholding the treatment of agricultural income as business income. The importance of maintaining proper records and providing adequate evidence to support income declarations was emphasized, highlighting compliance with tax regulations and the burden of proof on the taxpayer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:38:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1470 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351591</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, reducing the trading addition but upholding the treatment of agricultural income as business income. The importance of maintaining proper records and providing adequate evidence to support income declarations was emphasized, highlighting compliance with tax regulations and the burden of proof on the taxpayer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>