<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1469 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351590</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order confirming the irregularly availed Cenvat Credit and penalty imposition. It emphasized that since the credit was reversed and not utilized for duty payment, interest and penalty were not justified. The judgment highlighted the necessity of actual credit utilization for duty payment and clarified that recovery provisions apply to wrongly taken or utilized credits, not merely availed ones.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:38:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1469 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351590</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order confirming the irregularly availed Cenvat Credit and penalty imposition. It emphasized that since the credit was reversed and not utilized for duty payment, interest and penalty were not justified. The judgment highlighted the necessity of actual credit utilization for duty payment and clarified that recovery provisions apply to wrongly taken or utilized credits, not merely availed ones.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>