<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1462 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351583</link>
    <description>Excise duty on sugar syrup used in biscuit manufacture failed because the record did not establish the fructose content needed for the tariff classification adopted by the department, and there was no reliable test evidence that the product matched the described excisable item. On cream, the demand could not be sustained without first examining whether the product, in the condition in which it emerged, was marketable. The tribunal therefore set aside the demand on sugar syrup and remanded the cream issue for de novo consideration on marketability after hearing the assessee and allowing fresh evidence if necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1462 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351583</link>
      <description>Excise duty on sugar syrup used in biscuit manufacture failed because the record did not establish the fructose content needed for the tariff classification adopted by the department, and there was no reliable test evidence that the product matched the described excisable item. On cream, the demand could not be sustained without first examining whether the product, in the condition in which it emerged, was marketable. The tribunal therefore set aside the demand on sugar syrup and remanded the cream issue for de novo consideration on marketability after hearing the assessee and allowing fresh evidence if necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>