<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1443 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351564</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, determining that transactions involving the purchase of shares and providing guarantees are on capital account and not subject to transfer pricing provisions. The Tribunal also found that the guarantee fee charged was at arm&#039;s length and allowed the deduction of expenses related to the abandoned IPO as revenue expenditure. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1443 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351564</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, determining that transactions involving the purchase of shares and providing guarantees are on capital account and not subject to transfer pricing provisions. The Tribunal also found that the guarantee fee charged was at arm&#039;s length and allowed the deduction of expenses related to the abandoned IPO as revenue expenditure. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>