<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1436 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351557</link>
    <description>For provisional assessments relating to periods before 25.06.1999, excess duty paid could be adjusted against short-paid duty when the assessment was finalised. The bar of unjust enrichment under Rule 9B(5) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 did not apply to such finalisation, even if the assessment was completed later. On that basis, the demand was held unsustainable and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1436 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351557</link>
      <description>For provisional assessments relating to periods before 25.06.1999, excess duty paid could be adjusted against short-paid duty when the assessment was finalised. The bar of unjust enrichment under Rule 9B(5) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 did not apply to such finalisation, even if the assessment was completed later. On that basis, the demand was held unsustainable and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>