<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1431 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351552</link>
    <description>The mandatory penalty and interest imposed under Rule 96ZP of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 were unsustainable after the Supreme Court in Shree Bhagwati Steel Rolling Mills struck down the underlying compounded levy provisions. Applying that binding ruling, the Tribunal held that the levy could not be upheld and set aside the penalty and interest. The remaining portions of the impugned order were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:37:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1431 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351552</link>
      <description>The mandatory penalty and interest imposed under Rule 96ZP of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 were unsustainable after the Supreme Court in Shree Bhagwati Steel Rolling Mills struck down the underlying compounded levy provisions. Applying that binding ruling, the Tribunal held that the levy could not be upheld and set aside the penalty and interest. The remaining portions of the impugned order were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>