<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1137 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196332</link>
    <description>The appeal regarding the valuation of goods transferred to a sister unit under Central Excise duty, focusing on the applicability of Rule 4 versus Rule 8 of Valuation Rules, 2000, was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the lower authority&#039;s decision, stating that the valuation under Rule 8 by the respondent-assessee was appropriate. The case emphasized the importance of adhering to Valuation Rules and understanding the applicable provisions for determining excisable goods&#039; duty value accurately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1137 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196332</link>
      <description>The appeal regarding the valuation of goods transferred to a sister unit under Central Excise duty, focusing on the applicability of Rule 4 versus Rule 8 of Valuation Rules, 2000, was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the lower authority&#039;s decision, stating that the valuation under Rule 8 by the respondent-assessee was appropriate. The case emphasized the importance of adhering to Valuation Rules and understanding the applicable provisions for determining excisable goods&#039; duty value accurately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>