<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 91 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10762</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the addition to the closing stock valuation and rejected the change from market rate to average cost method by the assessee. The court found the alteration lacked bona fide reasons and appeared aimed at reducing profits. Consequently, the addition to the income of Rs. 80,191 was upheld, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 91 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10762</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the addition to the closing stock valuation and rejected the change from market rate to average cost method by the assessee. The court found the alteration lacked bona fide reasons and appeared aimed at reducing profits. Consequently, the addition to the income of Rs. 80,191 was upheld, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>