https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196323 State action directly threatening the functioning of a newspaper was treated as a restriction on press freedom and was held amenable to challenge under Article 32. The Court also held that the Lieutenant Governor had no independent authority over the lease or Union property in Delhi absent specific entrustment. On the planning issues, construction with FAR 360 and a double basement was found not to breach the Master Plan, the Zonal Development Plan, the lease covenants, or the municipal regime. The re-entry and demolition notices were further held invalid for mala fides, and the Union was bound by the earlier permission on which the petitioners had acted. en-us Mon, 07 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:29:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196323 State action directly threatening the functioning of a newspaper was treated as a restriction on press freedom and was held amenable to challenge under Article 32. The Court also held that the Lieutenant Governor had no independent authority over the lease or Union property in Delhi absent specific entrustment. On the planning issues, construction with FAR 360 and a double basement was found not to breach the Master Plan, the Zonal Development Plan, the lease covenants, or the municipal regime. The re-entry and demolition notices were further held invalid for mala fides, and the Union was bound by the earlier permission on which the petitioners had acted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196323