https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196314 The Delhi HC admitted the case and framed a question on the interpretation of "permanent establishment" by the ITAT. The court clarified no question was framed on interest levy under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act. The appellant could raise this issue later. The case was to be listed with related cases, allowing parties to file required documents. en-us Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Nov 2017 11:49:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196314 The Delhi HC admitted the case and framed a question on the interpretation of "permanent establishment" by the ITAT. The court clarified no question was framed on interest levy under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act. The appellant could raise this issue later. The case was to be listed with related cases, allowing parties to file required documents. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196314